Wednesday, June 27, 2012

List the three fallacies of evolution.502-1 - 6 - 1

Why does mankind insist on finding a reason for the miracle of life other than by the Word of God? I’ve long thought it had to do with man not wanting to be responsible to a Creator God. If one is a creation of God than one is accountable to God. Therefore one would break the Word of God at the jeopardy of his/her soul. Also, man keeps trying to reject our God-given unique place in the universe while holding to the contrary belief that that we can do it ourselves. Satan is the father of lies and of confusion. So does mankind believe in the theory of evolution due to confusion from Satan after the Fall or is it because we really believe that we come from some primordial ooze? Do people really think that “we come from ooze by way of the zoo?”
Once again I digress. So quoting Chuck Missler, Three Fallacies of “Evolution” include:
• The violations of the Entropy Law (The Second Law of Thermodynamics):
• Critical System Interdependencies essential for survival;
• The use of digital languages.
Entropy dictates that things go from a state of being organized to one of randomness. The watch example is great as is the possibility of a tornado ripping through a junkyard creating a Boeing 747 aircraft. Perhaps another example of entropy would be the disintegration of music into hard metal. Also by the second law of thermodynamics the amount of energy input is greater than the output: the universe is running downhill. The period of time of the greatest reversal of entropy was during the creation and will be again when Jesus returns to earth to rule.
Systems just plain depend on each other. Just as “no man is an island unto himself” no form of life sustains itself by itself. Man and animals breathe in oxygen and expel carbon dioxide which plants use and in turn give off oxygen. The Golden Plover flies further than would be possible given the amount of food (fuel) can carry in their body. So these unique birds fly in formation allowing some be helped by the drag of the lead birds. During the long trip the birds will share taking the lead, a great example of interdependencies.
As for The use of digital languages, here I will again quote from Dr. Missler:
Digital (Symbolic) Codes
• Digital Codes derive their meaning from arbitrary but consistent definitions (semantics).
• Digital codes are dependent upon their context (syntax).
• Digital codes evidence design.
My knowledge of digital codes is rather limited. Years ago I had a thorough introduction to Boolean algebra. Most of what I remember is that something is either off or it was on it, the value is either 1 or 0 and it was either yes or no. I am blown away by the concept that we live in a universe that incorporates digital languages/codes. Once again I am left awestruck by the astounding God we serve.

No comments:

Post a Comment